Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The Acer ES Series 4 Select is the better overall choice for most riders: it delivers stronger real-world performance, more practical range, better weather protection and a more polished, tech-forward package at a noticeably lower price. It feels like a sensible everyday tool rather than a science project in overpromising "pro-level" hardware.
The City Boss GV4 still makes sense if you're a heavier or taller rider who really needs that extra load capacity, or if comfort and adjustability trump everything else and you don't mind paying more for less range and average power. It's a big, soft couch of a scooter - just not a particularly efficient one.
If you want the better-balanced, lower-drama commuter, go Acer; if you're big, gentle on hills and obsessed with suspension comfort, the GV4 can still be your friend. Now, let's dig into the details and see where each one shines - and where the marketing gloss rubs off.
Electric scooters in this price band have grown up. We're no longer comparing shaky toys with solid tyres to whatever didn't snap in half last month - we're choosing between proper transport tools. The City Boss GV4 and Acer ES Series 4 Select both aim to be your daily commuter, not your weekend adrenaline machine, and on paper they look surprisingly close.
I've put real kilometres on both: cobblestones, bike lanes, wet tram tracks, boring commutes and "let's see if it survives this shortcut" detours. One scooter tries to win you over with sheer bulk, dual suspension and a long feature list; the other with a calmer, more modern tech approach and a keener price.
Think of the City Boss GV4 as the sturdy workhorse that insists it's worth more than it really is, and the Acer ES Series 4 Select as the mildly nerdy office worker who secretly does everyone's job better. Let's see which one you actually want under your feet.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters live in the same general "serious commuter" category: bigger and tougher than rental-style toys, but still foldable and just about carryable for stairs and car boots. Neither is a performance monster, and neither is ultra-light. They're the middle lane of the scooter highway.
The City Boss GV4 aims at riders who want comfort, a tall and wide stance, and a frame that laughs at high rider weights. It sells itself as the everyman (and every-body) scooter with a very high weight limit and full dual suspension.
The Acer ES Series 4 Select, meanwhile, targets office commuters and students who care about range, safety tech, water resistance and decent power without going into silly territory. It's less about brute structure and more about efficient commuting and brand-backed reliability.
They cost similar money on paper - until you notice that the Acer comes in substantially cheaper while still ticking most "serious commuter" boxes. That alone makes this comparison worth your time.
Design & Build Quality
Park them side by side and the design philosophies are obvious. The City Boss GV4 looks like it was built by someone who started with the sentence "No, really, it won't break" and went from there. Thick aviation-grade aluminium, chunky stem, long deck, lots of visible hardware. It feels massively solid underfoot - and just a bit agricultural in places.
The Acer goes in the opposite direction: matte black stealth, clean lines, internal cable routing, and a generally more refined, electronics-brand sort of aesthetic. It looks like something you'd expect to see in a tech company's lobby. The frame still feels sturdy, but you don't get that overbuilt, "welded in a tractor factory" vibe.
In the hands, the GV4's controls feel functionally fine but slightly old-school: mechanical levers, a big round display pod bolted on, brake lines routed externally. Practical, but not exactly elegant. The Acer's cockpit is neater, with a slim integrated display, better thought-out button placement and grips that feel more "finished".
Where the GV4 claws some points back is adjustability and physical robustness: height-adjustable handlebars, a deck you could host a picnic on, and a folding joint designed to be tightened as it wears. But for overall build sophistication and design maturity, the Acer simply feels like the more modern, coherent product.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where the City Boss GV4 loudly clears its throat. Dual suspension front and rear, paired with chunky pneumatic tyres, gives it an undeniably plush ride. Over broken pavements and city scars, the GV4 soaks up the chatter so your knees don't have to. After a few kilometres of nasty paving stones, you step off surprisingly fresh.
The Acer counters with a front fork suspension and big tubeless tyres. It doesn't float in quite the same way as the softly-sprung GV4, especially at the rear where you're relying on tyre flex, but it does a respectable job of taming everyday bumps. Think "hatchback with decent shocks" versus the GV4's "soft SUV".
Handling-wise, the lower centre of gravity and better weight distribution of the Acer make it feel more precise in corners. It leans naturally into turns and feels calmer when you're weaving through slower cyclists. The GV4 is stable, sure, but you're very aware you're on a tall, long scooter - at speed it's more "big barge" than "nimble city knife".
If your route is a minefield of potholes and cobbles and you like a sofa-like ride, the GV4 is the comfier platform. If you prefer more controlled steering, especially when the pace creeps up, the Acer has the more confidence-inspiring chassis.
Performance
Both scooters quote similar rated motor power, but the way they deliver it couldn't be more different. The GV4's rear hub is tuned for gentle, predictable pull. It gets up to its modest top speed in a calm, linear way and sits there without drama on flat ground. You're not exactly blown backwards by acceleration, but it's good enough for mixing with city cyclists and slow traffic.
The Acer's motor, with its higher peak output and rear-wheel drive, has more punch in reserve. In its sportiest mode it steps off the line more eagerly, and you feel that extra torque on short climbs and while overtaking. It still isn't a hooligan scooter, but compared directly, the Acer feels livelier and more willing when you ask for power.
On hills, the gap widens. The GV4 will handle gentle city inclines acceptably, especially with lighter riders, but you can feel it running out of enthusiasm when the gradient increases - particularly if you're anywhere near its high load limit. The Acer, while not a mountain goat, keeps more of its pace on typical urban climbs and feels less like it's begging you to help with a kick.
Braking tells a similar story of approach. The City Boss runs dual mechanical discs plus an electronic motor brake. There's lots of hardware and plenty of stopping power, though the feel can be slightly abrupt if you grab a handful - you're in charge of modulation. The Acer's setup, with front disc and rear eABS, trades some raw bite for better stability: the electronic rear brake helps prevent lock-up, giving calmer, more controlled stops on wet or dusty surfaces.
If you care most about smooth, predictable performance and reassuring emergency stops, the Acer has the edge. If your focus is "two real discs or nothing" and you don't mind doing the finesse yourself, the GV4 will keep you happy - just don't expect fireworks when you open the throttle.
Battery & Range
On paper, both scooters talk big about range. In practice, the Acer actually walks the talk better. Its battery, while not enormous by enthusiast standards, is tuned for efficiency and gives you a comfortable city loop: commuting both ways with some detours still feels realistic without constant range anxiety.
The City Boss GV4, with its smaller battery, simply runs out of road sooner. If you keep it in the middle riding mode and ride sensibly, you can squeeze a full working day's worth of urban riding out of it, but not much more. Open it up in the fastest mode or add hills and heavier riders, and that advertised figure starts to look optimistic.
Both take a working-day or overnight-style charge, so neither wins on sheer charging speed, but the Acer's greater distance per charge makes the whole experience more relaxed. With the GV4 you start glancing at the battery gauge a bit earlier in the day; with the Acer you're more likely to get home and realise you still have a decent buffer left.
If you regularly ride longer distances, the Acer is the clearly less stressful partner. The GV4's battery is acceptable for shorter, flatter commutes - just don't move house halfway up a hill and expect miracles.
Portability & Practicality
On the scale, there's barely anything between them - both hover around that "you can carry me, but you won't enjoy it for long" weight class. If you've ever carried a heavy suitcase up two flights of stairs, you know roughly how this feels.
The difference is in the shape and folding. The GV4 folds into a long, somewhat lanky package. It's fine for car boots and train vestibules, but in tight lifts and tiny flat corridors that length becomes a nuisance. The folding mechanism itself is robust and adjustable, though: it locks down with conviction and can be tightened as it wears, which is genuinely useful for long-term owners.
The Acer folds into a slightly more compact footprint, with the stem clipping onto the rear, making it easier to grab and carry in one hand for short hops. It's still no featherweight, but the balance point is better chosen, so brief lifts - onto a train, up a short set of steps - feel less awkward.
As daily objects, both have strong stands, sensible fenders and can live happily under desks or in hallways. The GV4 adds a USB charging port on the display, which is charmingly practical when your phone is dying mid-navigation. The Acer counters with app-based motor locking and telemetry, which is arguably more useful in the long term.
If your life involves lots of short lifting and manoeuvring in tight spaces, the Acer is the less annoying companion. If you're mostly rolling from door to door with the odd staircase and like the idea of a folding joint you can keep tight for years, the GV4 still has its charms.
Safety
Both scooters take safety seriously, but with slightly different priorities.
The City Boss GV4 piles on hardware: dual disc brakes, an electronic brake assist, a bright metal-bodied headlight, animated turn signals, a dedicated brake light and even under-deck ambient lighting that creates a glowing halo around you at night. You're very visible, from just about every angle, and when set up properly the braking system hauls you down quickly from its modest top speed.
The Acer approaches safety with a more integrated, controlled mindset. Front disc and rear eABS keep the scooter planted under hard braking, especially on slick urban surfaces. The turn signals are prominent and easy to operate without taking your hands off the bars, and the lighting is strong and sensibly aimed. Add in water resistance that shrugs off surprise showers, and you're encouraged to keep riding even when the sky looks questionable.
Stability at speed is where the Acer feels more modern. Its chassis and tyre combo give a more planted feel when you're cruising near the top of its speed range. The GV4 is stable, but the soft suspension and tall stance can feel a bit floaty when you push on, especially with heavier riders.
Overall, the GV4 wins on sheer visibility bling and mechanical redundancy, but the Acer offers a more composed, weather-ready safety package that feels better aligned with how people actually ride in messy European cities.
Community Feedback
| City Boss GV4 | Acer ES Series 4 Select |
|---|---|
| What riders love Comfortable dual suspension, high load capacity, very adjustable cockpit, strong lighting and "solid" feel. |
What riders love Smooth ride, confident braking, useful turn signals, good range for commuting, modern design and trusted brand. |
| What riders complain about Hefty to carry, modest hill performance, limited practical range, average charging speed and puncture risk from tyres. |
What riders complain about Still heavy to lift, real-world range below marketing in sport mode, struggles on very steep hills, occasional app glitches. |
Price & Value
This is where things get a bit uncomfortable for the City Boss. It asks noticeably more money while offering less real-world range, comparable power and broadly similar weight. Yes, you get dual suspension and a sky-high load rating, but for an average-weight urban rider those advantages disappear quite quickly in daily use.
The Acer undercuts it by a solid margin yet still brings a stronger motor package, better hill performance, longer day-to-day range and a more developed safety and app ecosystem. You don't feel like you're making major compromises to save money - which is rare in this segment.
If you genuinely need the GV4's load capacity or its particular comfort formula, you can argue the price as a niche justified spend. For everyone else, the Acer simply gives you more scooter for fewer euros, which is difficult to ignore.
Service & Parts Availability
City Boss operates as a dedicated scooter brand with a focus on user-serviceable components - double-split rims, standard mechanical discs, an adjustable folding joint - all of which make home repairs and third-party servicing straightforward. For tinkerers and mechanically-minded riders, that's a plus.
Acer, on the other hand, leans on its global electronics support network. You're dealing with a big brand that already knows how to do warranty pipelines, spare parts logistics and customer service at scale. Parts may be a bit more "proprietary", but access to official service channels in many European countries is usually better.
In practice, if you enjoy fixing things yourself or have a favourite local repair shop, the GV4's component choices are friendly. If you prefer dropping your scooter off at an authorised centre and getting a ticket number, the Acer feels more reassuring.
Pros & Cons Summary
| City Boss GV4 | Acer ES Series 4 Select |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | City Boss GV4 | Acer ES Series 4 Select |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 400 W rear hub | 400 W rear hub (800 W peak) |
| Top speed | 30 km/h | 30 km/h (region-limited in some areas) |
| Claimed range | 25 km | 45-50 km |
| Real-world range (approx.) | 18-22 km | 30-35 km |
| Battery | 468 Wh (36 V, 13 Ah) | ≈ 378 Wh (36 V, 10,5 Ah, est.) |
| Weight | 20 kg | 19,7 kg |
| Brakes | Front & rear mechanical discs + electronic brake | Front disc + rear eABS electronic brake |
| Suspension | Front & rear suspension | Front fork suspension |
| Tyres | 10" x 2,5" pneumatic, split rims | 10" tubeless pneumatic |
| Max load | 150 kg | 120 kg |
| IP rating | Not specified | IPX5 |
| Charging time | 5-6 h | ≈ 5 h |
| Price (approx.) | 717 € | 489 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If I strip away the marketing and look at how these scooters behave in the real world, the Acer ES Series 4 Select is the more convincing package for most riders. It accelerates more willingly, climbs everyday hills with less grumbling, goes further on a charge, shrugs off rain, and still costs noticeably less. It feels like a modern commuter scooter designed by people who actually ride in cities.
The City Boss GV4 isn't a bad scooter - far from it - but it's a scooter that makes the most sense for a narrower audience than its price tag suggests. If you're tall, heavy, or both, and you want a super-forgiving ride with lots of suspension travel and a very solid frame, it has clear merits. You just have to accept that you're paying extra for comfort and load capacity, not for range or performance.
For the average European commuter who wants a dependable, reasonably quick, weather-resistant and not-insanely-priced daily ride, the Acer ES Series 4 Select is the smarter, more future-proof choice. The City Boss GV4 is the specialist tool; the Acer is the one that quietly does the job better, day in, day out.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | City Boss GV4 | Acer ES Series 4 Select |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,53 €/Wh | ✅ 1,29 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 23,90 €/km/h | ✅ 16,30 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ✅ 42,74 g/Wh | ❌ 52,12 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 0,67 kg/km/h | ✅ 0,66 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 35,85 €/km | ✅ 15,05 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 1,00 kg/km | ✅ 0,61 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ❌ 23,40 Wh/km | ✅ 11,63 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ✅ 13,33 W/(km/h) | ✅ 13,33 W/(km/h) |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,05 kg/W | ✅ 0,049 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ✅ 85,09 W | ❌ 75,60 W |
These metrics break down how efficiently each scooter uses your money, weight and energy. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km show value for battery and range; weight-related metrics reveal how much bulk you haul for the performance you get. Wh per km highlights energy efficiency, while power-to-speed and weight-to-power ratios hint at how lively the scooter feels. Average charging speed tells you how quickly the battery fills relative to its size.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | City Boss GV4 | Acer ES Series 4 Select |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Slightly heavier, bulkier feel | ✅ Marginally lighter, better balance |
| Range | ❌ Shorter real-world distance | ✅ Comfortably longer daily range |
| Max Speed | ✅ Meets class limit fine | ✅ Same top speed capability |
| Power | ❌ Feels modest, runs out | ✅ Stronger, more confident pull |
| Battery Size | ✅ Bigger pack on paper | ❌ Smaller capacity battery |
| Suspension | ✅ Dual, very plush ride | ❌ Single front only |
| Design | ❌ Functional, slightly dated look | ✅ Sleek, modern, integrated |
| Safety | ✅ Strong lights, dual discs | ✅ eABS, IPX5, indicators |
| Practicality | ❌ Bulky folded, less range | ✅ Easier to live with |
| Comfort | ✅ Very soft, forgiving | ❌ Less plush overall |
| Features | ✅ USB, transflective display | ✅ App, motor lock, signals |
| Serviceability | ✅ Standard parts, split rims | ❌ More proprietary bits |
| Customer Support | ❌ Smaller, regional footprint | ✅ Big-brand support network |
| Fun Factor | ❌ Comfortable but a bit dull | ✅ Livelier, more engaging |
| Build Quality | ✅ Solid, overbuilt structure | ✅ Refined, tight assembly |
| Component Quality | ✅ Decent mechanical hardware | ✅ Good motor, brakes, tyres |
| Brand Name | ❌ Less known internationally | ✅ Recognised global tech brand |
| Community | ❌ Smaller, more niche base | ✅ Broader, growing user base |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Very visible, halo lighting | ❌ Less theatrical, still good |
| Lights (illumination) | ✅ Strong headlight reach | ❌ Adequate but less standout |
| Acceleration | ❌ Gentle, slightly lazy | ✅ Sharper, more immediate |
| Arrive with smile factor | ❌ Comfortable, but uninspiring | ✅ Feels sprightly, satisfying |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Soft ride, tall ergonomics | ❌ Firmer, slightly busier feel |
| Charging speed | ✅ Slightly more W per hour | ❌ Slower relative to capacity |
| Reliability | ✅ Simple, service-friendly layout | ✅ Big-brand QC, sealed well |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Long, awkward footprint | ✅ Neater, easier to handle |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Heavy, tall, cumbersome | ✅ Slightly easier to lug |
| Handling | ❌ Floaty at speed | ✅ More planted, precise |
| Braking performance | ✅ Strong mechanical bite | ✅ Stable, controlled eABS mix |
| Riding position | ✅ Highly adjustable, roomy | ❌ Less adjustable, narrower |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Functional but basic | ✅ Better ergonomics, finish |
| Throttle response | ❌ Soft, slightly laggy | ✅ Smooth yet responsive |
| Dashboard/Display | ✅ Transflective, visible in sun | ❌ Standard LED, just adequate |
| Security (locking) | ❌ No integrated electronic lock | ✅ App motor lock available |
| Weather protection | ❌ No clear IP rating | ✅ IPX5, rain-friendly |
| Resale value | ❌ Harder sell, niche brand | ✅ Easier resale, known name |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Standard components, tweakable | ❌ More locked-down ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | ✅ Split rims, simple mechanics | ❌ Less DIY-friendly overall |
| Value for Money | ❌ Pricey for what you get | ✅ Strong spec for the price |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the CITY BOSS GV4 scores 3 points against the ACER ES Series 4 Select's 8. In the Author's Category Battle, the CITY BOSS GV4 gets 19 ✅ versus 27 ✅ for ACER ES Series 4 Select (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: CITY BOSS GV4 scores 22, ACER ES Series 4 Select scores 35.
Based on the scoring, the ACER ES Series 4 Select is our overall winner. On the road, the Acer ES Series 4 Select just feels like the more sorted everyday partner: it moves with more purpose, shrugs off real-world commutes with less fuss and leaves you with the pleasant sense that you didn't overpay for what you're getting. The City Boss GV4 has its charms - especially if you're bigger and crave that soft, cushy ride - but it never quite shakes the feeling that you're trading away too much range and polish for the privilege. If I had to live with one of these as my only scooter, I'd take the Acer's calmer competence and better balance of price, performance and practicality every time. The GV4 is nice to borrow on a rough Sunday path; the ES Series 4 Select is the one you actually rely on from Monday to Friday.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

